| Author | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Flanker30MKI |
|||
|
wasn't the airbus to be built in Kansas (or Kentucky?) anyway? So wouldn't this mean American jobs too?
=_= GO AHEAD, MAKE MY DAY! Tomcats Forever! |
|||
pdf27 |
|||
|
Boeing is doing the Civil Aircraft -> Tanker conversion in Kansas, the Airbus final assembly plant is being built in Mobile, Alabama.
Do you know they have eating dogs for the anorexic now? - Phil the Greek
|
|||
richard |
|||
|
Good news for you Airbus fans. It appears Boeing has pulled out of the bidding. Realizing that things were stacked against them and that the air force had
pretty much decided who they were going with. Boeing decided to pull out. So looks like Airbus has it locked up.
|
|||
SPANKYamerican |
|||
|
good news for everyone invloved....apart from boeing
"For those whos dreams were taken. Here are a few nightmares. This is gonna shine like a diamond in a goat's ass."
|
|||
richard |
|||
|
There was no point in Boeing even wasting it's time. The air force had pretty much settled on the Airbus tanker. So no matter what Boeing proposed the AF
was going to turn it down. Oh well, perhaps Boeing can now concentrate it's resources on other things.
|
|||
pdf27 |
|||
|
Boeing hasn't pulled out of the bidding, what they're doing is threatening to pull out unless the USAF give them at least 6 months extra and rewrite
the spec to suit them better (Northrop did much the same when they were originally considering whether or not to bid). Given how urgently the USAF think they
need this tanker, I suspect Boeing are going to get a rather dusty answer.
Do you know they have eating dogs for the anorexic now? - Phil the Greek
|
|||
richard |
|||
|
I cant imagine the AF giving them another 6 months. But the news I heard/read said that Boeing had pulled out.
|
|||
pdf27 |
|||
|
Still just a threat so far....
http://news.google.com/ne...s_group&resnum=1&ct=title
Do you know they have eating dogs for the anorexic now? - Phil the Greek
|
|||
Crolly |
|||
|
What a sad mess. First Boeing are sore losers and get the competition reopened, and then the threaten to DROP OUT? How can one NOT call them ridiculous cry
babies in need of a diaper change. This is getting pathetic.
|
|||
pdf27 |
|||
|
You should hear what Norman Dicks, the member of the House of Representatives for Boeing has been saying recently. People from Alabama are apparently
insufficiently competent to make the tankers... despite Boeing having production facilities there!
Do you know they have eating dogs for the anorexic now? - Phil the Greek
|
|||
SPANKYamerican |
|||
|
that's what we call the proverbial 'anal'
i don't like being reminded how sad some of the people in my country act sometimes
"For those whos dreams were taken. Here are a few nightmares. This is gonna shine like a diamond in a goat's ass."
|
|||
richard |
|||
|
Insufficiently competent? How do they figure? Why would they have facilities there if that were the case?
|
|||
pdf27 |
|||
|
Quite. The man's a fool, and is half a mile up Boeing's arse!
http://blog.al.com/live/2...oo_inexperienced_for.html
Do you know they have eating dogs for the anorexic now? - Phil the Greek
|
|||
Crolly |
|||
|
The man is an ass who is up Boeing's ass, who are asses. A whole lot of ass. That sums up this hole thing pretty good. Assery is never in short supply in
politics. Ass.
Ass to right of them, Ass to left of them, Ass in front of them Folley'd and blunder'd; |
|||
Flanker30MKI |
|||
|
Charge of the rear brigade, eh?
=_= GO AHEAD, MAKE MY DAY! Tomcats Forever! |
|||
pdf27 |
|||
Flanker30MKI wrote:If so it can't be a fat arse - the charge of the Heavy Brigade was rather a success...
Do you know they have eating dogs for the anorexic now? - Phil the Greek
|
|||
richard |
re | ||
|
Well now it apears that the decision wil be put of until next year. Aparently they now cant make up their minds who to go with. The move suposedly favors
Boeing. I doubt it. If Mcain is elected no doubt Airbus will get the contract. After all, he flew to Wichita on a plane made by Airbus. Talk about a slap in
the face to the people of that city. I dont see why the delay. Just make the decision and get it over with.
|
|||
pdf27 |
|||
|
Obama comes down on the side of Boeing... What was that you were saying about him being willing to be nice to allies yesterday Spanky? This pretty much
guarantees if he gets elected Boeing will stack the price right up to rip off the government, and it will really put a crimp on potential collaborative
projects if it becomes apparent the US is going to take a distinctly French attitude to international collaboration...
U.S. Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama endorsed on Friday a Pentagon decision to let the next administration resolve a thorny dispute among aerospace manufacturers for a $35 billion Air Force tanker program. "While it was right for the Pentagon to cancel competition ... for the next generation of tankers, it was wrong for John McCain to reward two of the Washington lobbyists who worked against Boeing with jobs on his campaign," Obama told a conference of machinists and aerospace workers. Defense Secretary Robert Gates said on Wednesday he was dropping plans to rerun the competition between Boeing Co (BA.N: Quote, Profile, Research, Stock Buzz) and a rival team made up of Northrop Grumman Corp (NOC.N: Quote, Profile, Research, Stock Buzz) and Europe's EADS. Gates said it was time for a "cooling off" period. Northrop beat Boeing for the deal on Feb. 29. In March, Boeing protested on procedural grounds, prompting what was to have been a do-over by the end of this year. Boeing had threatened to walk away on the grounds that it needed more time to offer a bigger plane. Obama, a senator from Illinois where Boeing is headquartered, accused McCain, the Republican nominee, of favoring policies that hurt American workers and being cozy with lobbyists who oppose Boeing's bid. "John McCain just doesn't get it. Just ask your brothers and sisters at Boeing," Obama told machinists and aerospace workers as he spoke to their conference in Florida via satellite from New York. McCain, a senator from Arizona, led a drive in 2003 to kill an initial $23.5 billion Air Force plan to lease and buy, without competition, 100 Boeing 767s as tankers. He tarred it as a sweetheart deal for Boeing and a "rip-off" for taxpayers. Throughout 2006, McCain corresponded with senior Pentagon officials about draft versions of the Air Force's plan to seek competitive tanker bids, including his concerns about plans to factor in World Trade Organization disputes over subsides for commercial airliners. Boeing and EADS subsidiary Airbus -- which would provide the air frame for Northrop's tanker -- have accused each other of using illegal government subsidies to help peddle their wares worldwide. Taking aim at McCain's trade agenda, Obama said, "When American workers hear John McCain talking about putting country first, it's fair to ask -- which country?" McCain has not commented on the cancellation of the tanker contest and his representatives have not responded to repeated questions about the matter. Several former EADS lobbyists later worked on McCain's campaign. Tom Loeffler, the head of a lobbying firm called The Loeffler Group, left the campaign in May after it imposed new rules curbing the involvement of lobbyists. Obama, in his remarks to the machinists, also pledged to take a tough stance on China's currency and he insisted he supports trade but also a level playing field. "It's why I will enforce our trade agreements and end China's manipulation of its currency," he said. "And it's why any trade agreement I would support must contain real, enforceable standards for workers."
Do you know they have eating dogs for the anorexic now? - Phil the Greek
|
|||