<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.css" media="screen"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">

	<channel>
	  <!-- main channel info -->
        <title>American Defence changes </title>
        <link>http://fighterplanes.yuku.com/topic/3928/t/American-Defence-changes.html</link>
        <description>
        <![CDATA[ 
  The American Secretary of Defense Gates, announced today the end to the F-22, C-17, and the CSAR is likely dead.



  A 2 billion $US increase in UAVs.



  He canceled the VF-71 6.5 billion $US presidential helicopter program for 23 new presidential helicopters. An replacement effort will restart in
  2011.



  purchase of 31 F/A-18s

  US Government will invest more money in the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) program, increasing the total budget for the program to $11.2 billion, up... ]]>
        </description>

		<!-- optional elements -->
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2006, Yuku</copyright>
		<managingEditor>feeds@yuku.com (FeedMaster)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster)</webMaster>
		<!-- note: dates need to be RFC 822 formated "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 00:00:01 GMT" -->
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 02:53:26 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 22:01:22 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Yuku Feeds 1.0</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<!-- <cloud domain="rpc.yuku.com" port="80" path="/RPC2" registerProcedure="pingMe" protocol="soap"/>-->
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		<!-- feed image -->
		
		<rating>
		{pics-1.1 &quot;http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) &quot;http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 ))
		</rating>
		<textInput>
			<title>Search</title>
			<description>Search Domain</description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://yuku.com/search/direct/</link>
		</textInput>
		<!-- skip
		<skipHours>
			<hour>23</hour>
		</skipHours>
		<skipDays>
			<day>Monday</day>
			<day>Wednesday</day>
			<day>Friday</day>
		</skipDays>-->
		<!-- extensions -->


		<!-- channel items -->
		<!-- descriptions should be shorter than 500 char to be polite -->
		<!-- html shoud be stripped or escaped -->
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: American Defence changes  ]]></title>
			<link>http://fighterplanes.yuku.com/reply/47051/t/American-Defence-changes.html#reply-47051</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Pretty much. What we&#39;re looking at here is a significant decrease in the US armed forces ability to achieve and maintain air superiority in the decades to
come, essentially nullifying the superiority enjoyed by them in the F-15 era back to being on technological par with the enemy along the lines of the F-4 era.
Though there will still be Raptors around, with these numbers it&#39;ll hardly be enough to accomplish much more than point operations. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (LeoJr)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://fighterplanes.yuku.com/sreply/47051</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 22:01:22 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: American Defence changes  ]]></title>
			<link>http://fighterplanes.yuku.com/reply/47050/t/American-Defence-changes.html#reply-47050</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ The F-35 is a good plane, but it can&#39;t match the F-22 in air-to-air. F-35s are good because they&#39;re VTOLs and are radar invisible. BUT they&#39;re also
meant for ground-attack. As said on fighter-planes.com: &quot;USAF-Multi-role aircraft (<u>primarily air-to-ground</u>) to replace F-16 and A-10 and to
complement F-22&quot;. This is a designated ground attack jet, not a replacement for the F-15. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (golightning)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://fighterplanes.yuku.com/sreply/47050</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 13:33:41 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: American Defence changes  ]]></title>
			<link>http://fighterplanes.yuku.com/reply/46855/t/American-Defence-changes.html#reply-46855</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Oh, I&#39;m sure the PoC F-35 is well capable of replacing the F-15.
<br>
<br>
Right. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (LeoJr)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://fighterplanes.yuku.com/sreply/46855</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 17:32:50 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: American Defence changes  ]]></title>
			<link>http://fighterplanes.yuku.com/reply/46854/t/American-Defence-changes.html#reply-46854</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ The crackpots claim there is no need for the F-22. Um yes there is. To replace those ageing F-15&#39;s. Cant hang on to them forever. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (richard)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://fighterplanes.yuku.com/sreply/46854</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 14:55:46 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: American Defence changes  ]]></title>
			<link>http://fighterplanes.yuku.com/reply/46844/t/American-Defence-changes.html#reply-46844</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ The 2448 f-35s mentioned represent the total planned US purchase, with 480 going to the navy, 340 going to the USMC and the remaining 1628 aircraft going to
the USAF.
<br>
<br>
That&#39;s the <span style="font-style: italic;">planned</span> total though.
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (NZ CHARIZARD)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://fighterplanes.yuku.com/sreply/46844</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 20:00:01 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: American Defence changes  ]]></title>
			<link>http://fighterplanes.yuku.com/reply/46802/t/American-Defence-changes.html#reply-46802</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ but they&#39;ll do it better than most other birds out there.....
<br>
<br>
As for the square mileage.....lets remember that there are also &quot;only&quot; about 200 strike eagles in operation with the USAF. These also have
commitments abroad.
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (sukhoiman)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://fighterplanes.yuku.com/sreply/46802</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 10:26:58 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: American Defence changes  ]]></title>
			<link>http://fighterplanes.yuku.com/reply/46799/t/American-Defence-changes.html#reply-46799</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ it&#39;s not that many. think of the USA in square miles. then consider it&#39;s commitments in the pacific and elsewhere abroad.
<br>
<br>
all the f-35s should fill the gap. they just won&#39;t get there as quickly...or as high ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (SPANKYamerican)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://fighterplanes.yuku.com/sreply/46799</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 09:09:48 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: American Defence changes  ]]></title>
			<link>http://fighterplanes.yuku.com/reply/46798/t/American-Defence-changes.html#reply-46798</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ ah....that makes sense.
<br>
<br>
187....its still a formidable number.
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (sukhoiman)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://fighterplanes.yuku.com/sreply/46798</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 05:03:19 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: American Defence changes  ]]></title>
			<link>http://fighterplanes.yuku.com/reply/46795/t/American-Defence-changes.html#reply-46795</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ leo mentioned that we are getting 187 f-22&#39;s
<br>
<br>
2443 f-35s will be produced. this number, i assume includes all our partners in the program.
<br>
<br>
so the USAF will without a doubt have a very formidable fighter force. one that will be un-matched globally.
<br>
<br>
we can only assume that billions are being saved for upcoming UCAV projects that will come online and fill a large proportion of our force around the time we
plan on retiring...maybe before? ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (SPANKYamerican)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://fighterplanes.yuku.com/sreply/46795</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 11:02:14 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: American Defence changes  ]]></title>
			<link>http://fighterplanes.yuku.com/reply/46792/t/American-Defence-changes.html#reply-46792</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Hang on....so this means that even the limited F-22 production is not going to take place?
<br>
<br>
That&#39;s a bunch of bollocks.
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (sukhoiman)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://fighterplanes.yuku.com/sreply/46792</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 09:48:15 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: American Defence changes  ]]></title>
			<link>http://fighterplanes.yuku.com/reply/46791/t/American-Defence-changes.html#reply-46791</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ the f-22 has been so long coming that it&#39;s not as special as it used to be.
<br>
<br>
it&#39;s a great shame though. it&#39;s without a doubt the most capable fighter aircraft in the world. a squadron of these can send a massive message to
someone you don&#39;t like ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (SPANKYamerican)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://fighterplanes.yuku.com/sreply/46791</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 09:08:17 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: American Defence changes  ]]></title>
			<link>http://fighterplanes.yuku.com/reply/46788/t/American-Defence-changes.html#reply-46788</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Meh. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (LeoJr)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://fighterplanes.yuku.com/sreply/46788</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 07:54:42 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: American Defence changes  ]]></title>
			<link>http://fighterplanes.yuku.com/reply/46787/t/American-Defence-changes.html#reply-46787</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Recession+ too (two) many wars spoil the airforce<img height="15" src="http://www.ezboard.com/intl/aenglish/images/emoticons/wink.gif" width="15" alt="image">

<p><br></p> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (MOSHEDAYAN)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://fighterplanes.yuku.com/sreply/46787</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 07:01:52 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: American Defence changes  ]]></title>
			<link>http://fighterplanes.yuku.com/reply/46294/t/American-Defence-changes.html#reply-46294</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Well, that completes the news of the other topic proclaiming the F-22 dead. Well, at least they keep their 187 and will have a bunch more F-35s to attempt to
make the gap. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (LeoJr)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://fighterplanes.yuku.com/sreply/46294</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 19:33:46 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ American Defence changes  ]]></title>
			<link>http://fighterplanes.yuku.com/topic/3928/t/American-Defence-changes.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <ul>
  <li>The American Secretary of Defense Gates, announced today the end to the F-22, C-17, and the CSAR is likely dead.</li>
</ul>

<ul>
  <li>A 2 billion $US increase in UAVs.</li>
</ul>

<ul>
  <li>He canceled the VF-71 6.5 billion $US presidential helicopter program for 23 new presidential helicopters. An replacement effort will restart in
  2011.</li>
</ul>

<ul>
  <li>purchase of 31 F/A-18s</li>

  <li>US Government will invest more money in the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter (JSF)... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (godanov)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://fighterplanes.yuku.com/topic/3928</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 02:53:26 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
    <!-- end items -->

  </channel>
</rss>